Welcome. Please login or register to post on Brewers Roundtable. Thanks!
Kettle Screen Or False Bottom
6 posts • Page 1 of 1
Kettle Screen Or False Bottom
I am gradually acquiring my upgrade equipment to start all grain brewing. I was a good boy this year and Santa brought me a 10 gallon Igloo drink cooler that I am going to use for my mash tun. I am debating between buying a false bottom or a kettle screen. I like the economic solution of a kettle screen. But, will a false bottom be a better option and worth the extra money? What pros and cons does everyone have regarding each of these set ups?
Primary: Apfelwein (cider), American Amber Ale
Secondary: Nada
Bottled: California Common
On Tap: Anchor Liberty Clone, Irish Red Ale, Cigar City Jai Alai IPA (commercial guest tap)
Coming Soon:English Pale Ale
Secondary: Nada
Bottled: California Common
On Tap: Anchor Liberty Clone, Irish Red Ale, Cigar City Jai Alai IPA (commercial guest tap)
Coming Soon:English Pale Ale
-

miguelito - Brewing Master
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:44 pm
- Location: Tampa, FL
Re: Kettle Screen Or False Bottom
I use a copper manifold I built for very cheap, and I get pretty good efficiency. My cooler, however, is rectangular which made that option more practical.
IMO, if you have the funds, go with a false bottom. My belief (no experience), is that a full false bottom will help avoid "channels" in your sparge that might be created with a kettle screen. On the other hand, the difference in efficiency is probably nominal at a home-brew level.
IMO, if you have the funds, go with a false bottom. My belief (no experience), is that a full false bottom will help avoid "channels" in your sparge that might be created with a kettle screen. On the other hand, the difference in efficiency is probably nominal at a home-brew level.
___________________________________
Primary:
Czech Pilsner (NB All-grain kit)
8oz IPA (Cascade)
Secondary:
Imperial Stout
On Tap:
Blonde2 (Keg hopped)
Blonde1 (Boring Blonde, working on "clean" beer)
Primary:
Czech Pilsner (NB All-grain kit)
8oz IPA (Cascade)
Secondary:
Imperial Stout
On Tap:
Blonde2 (Keg hopped)
Blonde1 (Boring Blonde, working on "clean" beer)
-

curlyfat - Brewing Master
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 6:47 am
- Location: Casper, WY
Re: Kettle Screen Or False Bottom
Actually, as far as a manifold goes, I guess you could do it in a round cooler. Jim Palmer's "Hot to Brew" has a great little section on it. It's a great way to go since it's cheap and effective. Here's a Link: http://www.howtobrew.com/appendices/appendixD-1.html .
___________________________________
Primary:
Czech Pilsner (NB All-grain kit)
8oz IPA (Cascade)
Secondary:
Imperial Stout
On Tap:
Blonde2 (Keg hopped)
Blonde1 (Boring Blonde, working on "clean" beer)
Primary:
Czech Pilsner (NB All-grain kit)
8oz IPA (Cascade)
Secondary:
Imperial Stout
On Tap:
Blonde2 (Keg hopped)
Blonde1 (Boring Blonde, working on "clean" beer)
-

curlyfat - Brewing Master
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 6:47 am
- Location: Casper, WY
Re: Kettle Screen Or False Bottom
BEWARE THE COOLER TUN FALSE BOTTOMMMMMMMMM!
Seriously, though. I've seen a few posts of folks who have problems with false bottoms in a cooler tun. It seems the holes in the false bottom are too large, and allow grain particles through, which clog their drain valves. The simple solution is to cover the false bottom with a bit of stainless screen.
Efficiency-wise, I would have to agree that the false bottom is probably the better option. But I always say that good efficiency does not make better beer! Just cheaper beer. And on a homebrew scale, the difference between 70 and 75 percent efficiency is just not enough to worry about, IMO.
For my first tun, I used a cheap-o screen which I pulled off of a (brand new!!!) water line for a toilet. Now, I can't stress enough that the NEWness of this water line is paramount!
I used that tun for a few years, and I had efficiencies ranging from 55 percent to 78 percent. My efficiency rose tremendously when I started using a higher quality grain. Nothing different in the process, just a higher quality imported grain.
Whatever you choose, I'm sure it'll work just fine. I wouldn't stress over the option too much.
Take it easy!
Seriously, though. I've seen a few posts of folks who have problems with false bottoms in a cooler tun. It seems the holes in the false bottom are too large, and allow grain particles through, which clog their drain valves. The simple solution is to cover the false bottom with a bit of stainless screen.
Efficiency-wise, I would have to agree that the false bottom is probably the better option. But I always say that good efficiency does not make better beer! Just cheaper beer. And on a homebrew scale, the difference between 70 and 75 percent efficiency is just not enough to worry about, IMO.
For my first tun, I used a cheap-o screen which I pulled off of a (brand new!!!) water line for a toilet. Now, I can't stress enough that the NEWness of this water line is paramount!
Whatever you choose, I'm sure it'll work just fine. I wouldn't stress over the option too much.
Take it easy!
-

GuitarLord5000 - Brewing Master
- Posts: 489
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 4:07 am
- Location: Carencro, Louisiana
Re: Kettle Screen Or False Bottom
+1 on everything, Guitarlord! We must always remember the mantra: "Relax, don't worry, and have a home-brew." Do what works for you and, remember, all the options will work. That's why there's debate between them.
___________________________________
Primary:
Czech Pilsner (NB All-grain kit)
8oz IPA (Cascade)
Secondary:
Imperial Stout
On Tap:
Blonde2 (Keg hopped)
Blonde1 (Boring Blonde, working on "clean" beer)
Primary:
Czech Pilsner (NB All-grain kit)
8oz IPA (Cascade)
Secondary:
Imperial Stout
On Tap:
Blonde2 (Keg hopped)
Blonde1 (Boring Blonde, working on "clean" beer)
-

curlyfat - Brewing Master
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 6:47 am
- Location: Casper, WY
Re: Kettle Screen Or False Bottom
Muchas gracias amigos! I think I am going to opt for the false bottom. I found a pretty reasonable price with Northern Brewer.
Primary: Apfelwein (cider), American Amber Ale
Secondary: Nada
Bottled: California Common
On Tap: Anchor Liberty Clone, Irish Red Ale, Cigar City Jai Alai IPA (commercial guest tap)
Coming Soon:English Pale Ale
Secondary: Nada
Bottled: California Common
On Tap: Anchor Liberty Clone, Irish Red Ale, Cigar City Jai Alai IPA (commercial guest tap)
Coming Soon:English Pale Ale
-

miguelito - Brewing Master
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:44 pm
- Location: Tampa, FL
6 posts • Page 1 of 1
Return to All-Grain and Partial Mash
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
Search Brewers Roundtable
Main Menu
California
Flatfender Brewing Co
American Coffee Urn
Folsom Brewmeister
Fermentation Solutions
Marabella Vineyard
New York Homebrew Emporium
Texas American Firehouse Brewing Supply
Nebraska Kirk's Brew
Brew Bums
Internet Brewmation
Niko's Homebrew
New Jersey Rubino's Supplies
Indianna Red Barn Winemaking
Beer Brewing Sites Cryptobrewology
Beermath
Stir Starters
The Weekly Brew
New York
Texas
Nebraska
Internet
New Jersey
Indianna
Beer Brewing Sites
